An agent acts. Suron AI is what keeps up with it.
A model reads. An agent holds an identity, carries permissions and decides its own next call — and the MCP server in front of it hands over the tools. Suron AI finds that surface, attacks it, and holds the call before it executes.
Suron AI puts an object on that surface: an asset to grade, a target to attack, a call to hold while policy is checked, and a finding that arrives with the change to make rather than an alert. It is one assistant from end to end, which is the only reason the fix knows what the finding was scored against.
An agent with tool permissions is a new class of asset
Posture tooling has an object for a bucket, a role and a virtual machine. It has none for a caller that chooses what to do next and spends a real credential doing it.
What an MCP server exposes
Tools, resources and prompts. Every tool is a callable with a real credential behind it — a database connection, a repository token, an internal API key. The server is an authorisation boundary that nobody wrote a policy for.
Why that makes the agent an asset
It runs unattended, its permissions are standing rather than requested, and the credential is spent on its judgement rather than a person's. Excessive permissions and rogue agents are AI-native risks precisely because a traditional posture tool has no object to hang them on.
What Suron AI does about it
Discovers every agent framework and MCP server across cloud, code and SaaS, maps each tool to the identity and the data it can reach, attacks it with 6 agentic attack classes and 15+ MCP risk classes, and scores what comes back against MITRE ATLAS, EU AI Act 2024, NIST AI RMF 1.0, ISO/IEC 42001, OWASP LLM Top 10.
Suron AI maps the OWASP Agentic Top 10
Mapped clause by clause · OWASP ASI 2026- 01Agent Goal & Instruction Hijack
- 02Tool Misuse
- 03Identity & Privilege Abuse
- 04Agentic Supply Chain
- 05Unexpected Code Execution
- 06Memory & Context Poisoning
- 07Insecure Inter-Agent Communication
- 08Cascading & Resource Failures
- 09Human-Agent Trust Exploitation
- 10Rogue & Unmanaged Agents
The finding arrives with the policy already written
A row that tells you an agent is over-permissioned is a ticket for somebody else. Every row in this queue carries the change that closes it, and nothing in it is a severity label with a link to a vendor doc.
Right-size the agent's storage role
Replace blanket storage access with a read-only policy scoped to the buckets the agent has actually called. Suron AI writes the policy, names every control the change answers, and re-scans to confirm it held.
- 01
Right-size the policy
Generated from the calls the agent has actually made, not from what the role is named.
- 02
Map to controls
The same change answered against every framework that asks for it, once.
- 03
Verify
A re-scan confirms the fix landed, and nothing is closed until it agrees.
The tool call is the last place a mistake is still reversible
Once an agent's call has executed, the row is deleted, the ticket is closed, the branch is pushed. Suron AI sits in front of the call rather than in the report afterwards.
allow
The call goes to the tool untouched, and the decision is recorded with it.
redact
The arguments or the result travel without the part policy says must not.
approve
The call is held at the boundary until a human releases it.
deny
The call never reaches the tool, and the agent is told why.
- Tool arguments
- Tool results
- Intent drift
- Human approval
- Session history
Policy is written per tool, not per agent — the same runtime can be trusted with one call and held on the next. When it has to stop entirely, there is a session kill switch.
One assistant, from the finding to the proof
Discovery, prioritisation, correlation, remediation and reporting are one line of work, not five products. That is the only reason a finding can arrive already carrying its fix: the thing that found it is the thing that knows what the fix has to satisfy.
Discovery
Surfaces the agents, servers and tools nobody registered.
Prioritisation
Scores by exposure and blast radius, not by scanner severity.
Correlation
Chains findings across identity, data and runtime into one path.
Remediation
Writes the fix and names the controls it satisfies.
Reporting
Packages the evidence the way an auditor reads it.
All of it runs on the same asset spine as the rest of the platform — the agent the red team attacked and the agent the gate refused a call for are the same object, with the same identifier, in the same evidence trail. See the whole platform.